Discussion:
Performance of cvs
Peter Toft
2009-03-23 06:35:57 UTC
Permalink
Marko Käning
2009-03-23 08:23:10 UTC
Permalink
Actually you might want to try mercurial.
It's concept-wise different from CVS, since it's a distributed system, but
it is (from what I know) faster than SVN and probably even faster than
CVS. But I did not benchmark it.

Try it out and let us know! ;)
Arthur Barrett
2009-03-23 09:53:48 UTC
Permalink
Peter,
Mark D. Baushke
2009-03-23 13:08:32 UTC
Permalink
I think some proxy work was also done in CVS 1.12 but I'm not sure if
it was a full read/write through proxy.
Yes. cvs 1.12.13 has a full write-through proxy. It assumes CVSup or
similar mechanism would maintain the secondary servers and that the
primary server would be used for write operations directed at the
otherwise read-only secondary.

I am not sure if anyone is actively using this feature at this time.

-- Mark
Yaron Yogev
2009-03-24 15:43:14 UTC
Permalink
Mark,

In Jungo we used the write-through proxy method for a while in a
remote branch (later this branch was shut off).

--
Yaron Yogev
IT Software Developer
Jungo Software Technologies
Post by Mark D. Baushke
I think some proxy work was also done in CVS 1.12 but I'm not sure if
it was a full read/write through proxy.
Yes. cvs 1.12.13 has a full write-through proxy. It assumes CVSup or
similar mechanism would maintain the secondary servers and that the
primary server would be used for write operations directed at the
otherwise read-only secondary.
I am not sure if anyone is actively using this feature at this time.
        -- Mark
 application_pgp-signature_part
< 1KViewDownload
Loading...